Works of Julius Evola

[Владимир_Борисов 2,874]

Barone Giulio Cesare Andrea Evola

[Major works are in bold]

.

Men Among Ruins

The Doctrine of Self-Awakening

Ride the Tiger: Survival Manual for the Aristocrats of the Soul

Race and War

American Civilization

The Secret of Degeneration

Against the neo-Pagans

On Fascism

The Plurality and Duality of Civilizations

The Meaning and Context of Zen

Hitler and the Secret Societies

Revolt Against the Modern World

The Tragedy of the Romanian Iron Guard

.

A Very Large Selection of Short Essays and Excerpts

On Race (Guide with Thomislav Sunic)

Report to Himmler on Evola

Julius Evola's Concept of Race by Michael Bell

also enjoy this essay by a faggot race traitor

Overall, Evola's philosophy brings a lot to the esoteric table. His work attracts a cesspit of autistic rejects who think they are the new elite because no one liked them at school, but it is still worth exploring. I could not find either of his metaphysics of love or war online because some newrightfag in arktos media is making bank off of it. If anyone has anymore material, particularly reviews by other far-right intellectuals, they are most welcome.

[Omne Ensis Impera 66]

I generally prefer Nietzsche, but Evola too can be enlightening to read.

[Benjamin Noyles 5,920]

I generally prefer Nietzsche, but Evola too can be enlightening to read.

please, you need to stop posting.

[Son of Greece 36]

What's the problem with Nietzsche?

[Benjamin Noyles 5,920]

What's the problem with Nietzsche?

Nothing. My problem is with autism.

[Se Pro Patria Dedit 8,176]

Nothing. My problem is with autism.

Ironmarch is declared autism-free zone.

[Volksgrenadier 198]

Autism has it's advantages, I could be out drinking, surrounded by girls, having a good career, that kind of crap, instead I'm posting on iron march and working out how to survive if England descends into anarchy and mayhem!

[Владимир_Борисов 2,874]

>implying thread

>julius evola

>somehow

>autism

>implying...

[Talleyrand 2,551]

He looks very peculiar without the monocle.

[NatCap 61]

When I think of Julius Evola, I think "queer." Is that odd?

[Владимир_Борисов 2,874]

I think I'm not going to tolerate this sort of garbage. If you are not going to contribute anything, than shut up. More irrelevant insults will land you a formal warning.

[Se Pro Patria Dedit 8,176]

No, but it confirms you for shit tastes.

[NatCap 61]

I apologize, gentlemen. I did not think this mild opinion of mine was more offensive than the insults typically thrown about on here.

[Irisher 52]

I was going to actually read one of his works. Reason why I shouldn't?

[État de Stase 1,877]

I apologize, gentlemen. I did not think this mild opinion of mine was more offensive than the insults typically thrown about on here.

If you can back up your insult with something credible, it would satisfy my curiosity to why you call him a queer and it might calm Vlad a bit.

[Apostle of MoonMan 4,426]

http://www.nazi.org.uk/political%20pdfs/Evola-TheMetaphysicsOfWar.pdf

The thing with Evola is the same problem with any other person, it's with people who can't think for themselves and feel nothing so take everything word for fucking word and can't apply it to anything in any meaningful way nor convey it in a manner that isn't smug or weird, they're always the first to excuse themselves and their own ineptitude; socially awkward bitches and beta males who don't actually get it at all. I can guarantee any new-rightist isn't as 'traditionalist' as they would like to think they are, they're rejects latching onto something which does the lashing out for them. There's a reason I keep quoting Evola to a minimum, no matter how much I agree with him, it's because of those retards. Evola doesn't exactly always put it in a straight to the point way either.

[IntegralCymru 91]

http://www.nazi.org....hysicsOfWar.pdf

The thing with Evola is the same problem with any other person, it's with people who can't think for themselves and feel nothing so take everything word for fucking word and can't apply it to anything in any meaningful way nor convey it in a manner that isn't smug or weird, they're always the first to excuse themselves and their own ineptitude; socially awkward bitches and beta males who don't actually get it at all. I can guarantee any new-rightist isn't as 'traditionalist' as they would like to think they are, they're rejects latching onto something which does the lashing out for them. There's a reason I keep quoting Evola to a minimum, no matter how much I agree with him, it's because of those retards. Evola doesn't exactly always put it in a straight to the point way either.

You highlight a growing problem among parts of the British far-right.

[Leonidas 434]

My New Year's resolution was to read everything by Evola I could get my hands on. So I'm going to hang out here for a while.

[EvilCatholicNaziGoy 621]

I got a bunch of his PDFs that were down on here from a blog about three hours ago, the site has now been removed, and it was a blog that was standing for quite some time. Odd, but least I got them all.(http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:vB1g3W_5ELYJ:aryan-buddhism.blogspot.com/2012/02/julius-evola-his-works-free-downloads.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us)

[FigureofYouth 139]

I am very happy I found this, great reading this will be. Thank you for posting this Vlad

[Growth of the Soil 914]

http://mikrotheos.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post.html

English texts are farther down.

[Владимир_Борисов 2,874]

https://ia801504.us.archive.org/19/items/RadicalTraditionalist/A-Handbook-of-Traditional-Living-Raido.pdf

 

recommended reading

 

Metaphysics of War

[Honor et Patria 568]

https://ia801504.us.archive.org/19/items/RadicalTraditionalist/A-Handbook-of-Traditional-Living-Raido.pdf

 

recommended reading

Thanks.

[Torquemada 1,594]

I'd never support Evola and his primitive pagan anti-Christianism, but Vladimir and other Russians are simply butthurt becuase he said the truth about their beloved country.

 

"In the reawakening of the Russian race, and in its assumption that via Sovietism it has a prophetic universal mission, we see a confirmation of this regression to primitive forms of social life, which is found in many modern variants. Those who see in the new Russia the definitive revolt of a barbaric Asiatic race, which rejects the attempts made over two centuries by the Tsars to achieve European civilisation, and attempts instead to ally itself to the forms of social decomposition of the European world, are exactly correct. Bolshevism is the institutionalisation in a modern form of the ancient spirit of the Slavic race : a race without tradition, which, in its social mysticism, in its amalgam of sensuality and spirituality, in the predominance of pathos over ethos, of instinctivity over rationality, brings us back to the forms of pre-personal lack of differentiation and communist promiscuity characteristic of primitives.

The great upheaval of the War has restored this element to its free state, and has made it into a dreadful ferment of decomposition for the still healthy parts of Europe. 'Soviet civilisation', when announcing the coming of the 'proletarian era', dedicates itself openly to the destruction of the 'leprosy' of personality and freedom, "venoms of middle-class society", principles of every evil ; to the abolition, in addition, of private property, of all independent thought, and of every "motive which is supernatural, or, in any sense, foreign to the interests of the [working] class" (Lenin) ; to the advent of the "omnipotent mass-man", who alone must survive and give shape to the way of life and thought of all individuals. The modern side of Bolshevism is only in the 'method' : mechanisation and rationalisation are the means chosen to realise, in a universal social regime based solely on economics, the 'Mass Man', who already lived mystically in the Slavic soul. And, thus, Soviet civilisation converges in aim - consciously - with another race, which also falsely claims a regenerating universal mission and presumes to represent the last word of civilisation : America."

 

Replace "Slavic" with "Russian" and it's pretty much true.

 

His pseudo-intellecual bullshit aside, he's right and it hurts

[Александр Славрос 8,322]

So much kek.

 

Firstly, who is butthurt exactly? I for one am the most outspoken Evolafag on the forum.

 

Secondly, way to express how you are butthurt yourself - muh christianity, muh kike on a stick. "Primitive" - do you even into Revolt Against the Modern World? And then you run around the forum complaining about Russians.

 

Lastly: Evola is a typical European, i.e. completely ignorant of Russian history and culture, so he makes the same generalized assumptions about Russia which all Europeans do i.e. "asian hordes", "barbarian drunks" and the likes.

 

And for bonus points: the quote is from a 1932 article, in an earlier work "Heathen Imperialism" he also mentions how Slavs supposedly don't have a tradition, yet in the 1939 article "A Victim of Israel" where he talks about Stolypin he presents a different take:

 

 

At the end of the 19th century, one man proposed another solution, and even began to apply it : Stolypin. Many factors facilitated his work. In the first place, the possibilities of the Russian land were such as to make autarchy a viable proposition for the empire. In the second, the force of its ancient traditions was still such as to preserve alive the feeling that, between a small proprietor and a king, between a hereditary plot and an entire realm, there was no greater difference than one of degree upon one and the same scale of values, which was not material, but, above all, spiritual. Finally, there was the unspoilt nature of the Russian rural class, loyal and obedient, uncontaminated by the capitalist mentality which was as yet unknown and alien to it, all this being prior to the more recent and unpleasant examples thereof. Stolypin could therefore have attained his goal, and made of chaotic and restless Russia a masterpiece of a hitherto unknown type.

 

He would've done better work in regards to Russia if he actually knew more, once he did some research it is obvious that he revised at least some of his earlier assessments and dedicated an article to Stolypin as a man of tradition in Russia. And you can't really have the potential to build "a masterpice of hitherto unknown type" without Tradition to fall back on.

 

And calling Evola an pseudo-intellectual - what is that even? Is that a statement in defense of real intellectuals? Do you support Intellectuals and don't want Evola and his pseudo-intellectualism infecting your precious pristine intellectualism? Frankly, Evola hated intellectuals so he would never stoop to trying to be one.

 

"Representatives of this sort of "intellectualism" value the brilliant phrase and effective wielding of polemics and dialectics far more than the truth. They use ideas as an excuse;  it’s important for them to shine, to give the impression of a particularly smart person; same as contemporary politicians use party ideology exclusively for the purposes of advancing personal gains. It is a real "market of vanity" where the worst kind of subjectivism rules, often accompanied by honest narcissism, which becomes increasingly evident, when these gangs of intellectuals attain secular gloss (for instance in all sorts of literary "clubs" and cultural groups). Without a doubt there is a measure of truth in the words of whomever said that amongst all the varieties of idiocy the most disgusting idiocy is that of the intellectuals."

-The Bow and the Club (Julius Evola)